I’ve read the whole comic before, I know what his deal is, I’m just implying that “this guy lied while hitting on a girl in a bar” has a lot less dramatic explanations than what it turns out to be.
Regrettably, I did your sister…. yup the worse thing I’ve ever done. Scrubbed my self with steel wool afterwards, every time. Did I metion that I lament sleeping with your sister? Your sister, right?
Loading ...
Now I want to see Jason giving the thumbs up photoshopped into other stuff the way that Robin reaction shot was. Starting with panel four here.
Time for a reaction mashup!
Pokemon
It’s a bloody tradition.
Just dump ‘im
Tattoo
No steroids and no hormones
An amazing new use
Now, Professor….
BOOF!
There must be some way
It’s summer!
man, I get better ones AFTER I post
Beef?
SLAM!
Before we take off
Yer problem is
News crews
What a crock!
Subject
You look a mess.
Interesting command decision
Wh–
Can’t find Walkerton
Ah knew you were in cahoots!
Only Mr. Bellybutton
Forgive us
Talked to Sal again today
T-that was Squad 76
Ah swear, if you’ve touched ANYTHING
Did you have Jason make your bed
The cutest little vest
Pop up again
woops.
Jason looks weird when he’s smiling. I guess I got used to seeing him looking annoyed or grumpy about things.
Is this the most risqué It’s Walky has been yet?
I smell a Slipshine
“There are no Chesterfield industrialists!” is such a clunky line that even in 2010 I was like “jesus, that’s certainly a sentence.”
And I was willing to go to bat for Roomies! in 2010, so.
emphasis should at the very least be on the “no” rather then the “are”
Disagree. It’s fine as is.
No, the emphasis is placed just fine.
Placing it on the ‘no’ suggests you’ve been asked to do a count, and found none.
Placing it on ‘are’ fits the actual situation – a claim has been made, fact checked, and found to be counterfactual.
There are zero Chesterfield industrialists, ah, ah, ah!
You really think someone would do that – just lie about coming from a wealthy British family while talking to a girl in a bar?
If I were to explain this it would be a spoiler.
I’ve read the whole comic before, I know what his deal is, I’m just implying that “this guy lied while hitting on a girl in a bar” has a lot less dramatic explanations than what it turns out to be.
How does Jason’s “legal existance” depend on SEMME background checks?
Isn’t SEMME claimed to be a secret organisation? I.e. SEMME legally doesn’t exist?
Cause and effect is the other way – ‘Jason doesn’t legally exist’ is what they found, not a consequence of their checking his background.
Regrettably, I did your sister…. yup the worse thing I’ve ever done. Scrubbed my self with steel wool afterwards, every time. Did I metion that I lament sleeping with your sister? Your sister, right?
worsT
Originally posted:
October 9, 2002
This comic must be redrawn for the sake of the Happy Love Pants!